Today is poll day apparently – being the end of the quarter.<\/p>\n
In the national race, Rasmussen shows Trump +4 over Hillary<\/strong>. They didn’t include Gary Johnson (Libertarian) or the Green Party. While nobody realistically expects Johnson to win, you can’t get an accurate poll without them as choices<\/p>\n With just Trump vs Hillary:<\/p>\n Rasmusussen => has Trump +4 Add in Johnson & Stein Reuters is not an American company and very much represents the Financial Establishment that Trump is fighting against. I don’t trust their poll at all. <\/p>\n http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/docs\/2016\/Reuters_June_25_to_29_2016.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n They start out by first asking what issues matter to you (from their list), then how Barack Obama is doing. If I’m getting these questions, the expectation is clear. People are not voting for Trump because of a detailed rational decision process. Government overreach is not offered as an option.<\/p>\n Reuters is polling registered voters, not likely voters. Democrats are less likely to actually vote. The Trump vs Hillary question doesn’t mention randomizing the answers, and Hillary is listed first.<\/p>\n This poll is so incongruous with the behavior of the Republican Party, my head is hurting.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Today is poll day apparently – being the end of the quarter. In the national race, Rasmussen shows Trump +4 over Hillary. They didn’t include Gary Johnson (Libertarian) or the Green Party. While nobody realistically expects Johnson to win, you … Continue reading
\n Investor’s business daily => Hillary +4
\n PPP => Hillary +4
\n Reuters (British) +> Hillary +10<\/p>\n
\n IBD => Hillary +1
\n PPP => Hillary +4
\n Reuters => Hillary +11<\/p>\n