It’s hard to ask questions like this these days – but have we arrived at the point where we have given up on justice and just use bullets?<\/p>\n
So far, the LA Times seems to be the only media source asking – did the FBI just shoot Jim DiMaggio to deliver “justice” and skip all those steps like gathering proof and having a trial?<\/p>\n
LA Times<\/a><\/p>\n Briefly he was the 40 year old family friend who took an unhealthy interest in their 16 year old daughter. One account mentions them going on a week long trip together without objections from the parents.<\/p>\n Her mom and younger brother were found dead inside Mr Dimaggio’s burning house, and he headed to Idaho with the daughter. It’s a logical inference that he killed them, but not the only plausible explanation. He was a suspect and hadn’t been charged with the crime.<\/p>\n When the FBI found his vehicle, they were concerned it might be booby trapped. It wasn’t.<\/p>\n The FBI has been very coy so far about why the hostage rescue team shot Mr DiMaggio. They have not stated that he had any weapon, that he engaged in any threatening way toward them or the girl – there isn’t even any strong evidence that the girl was there against her will. The relatives are acting pretty strangely.<\/p>\n Two words to ponder – Randy Weaver<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It’s hard to ask questions like this these days – but have we arrived at the point where we have given up on justice and just use bullets? So far, the LA Times seems to be the only media source … Continue reading