http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fgw-libya-nato-20110409,0,6322599.story
Call me crazy, but that picture screams out “Mercenary soldier” fighting for the “rebels”. I wonder how much we’re paying him.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fgw-libya-nato-20110409,0,6322599.story
Call me crazy, but that picture screams out “Mercenary soldier” fighting for the “rebels”. I wonder how much we’re paying him.
Do you mean that just because NATO has joined forces with Al Qieda, and it appears Al Qieda is calling in airstrikes on targets, and it is reported that CIA may have assets on the ground in Libya, you think we may have something to worry about?
A democrat Congress Critter was already talking about how much of the “frozen assets” the US Military should take for the expenses of destroying Libya
This story is 3 days old…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8427540/Libya-al-Qaeda-receive-looted-Libyan-weapons.html
Seems like the “rebels” are more interested in selling captured weapons than using them. I can’t see any problem with al Qaida having a bunch of shoulder fired surface to air missiles, can you?
The really hilarious thing about all this is, unless something or someone truly significant and benevolent arrives on the scene fairly soon, we shall see the new and improved lame duck version of Barry on Steroids — Term II, coming to a declining nation near you.
Hey that rhymes.