Archive for April 21st, 2009

The Next Crisis – Upside Down 401(k)s

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

This will take a little longer than home mortgages to play out, but could be a much bigger disaster.

The types of people who “used the system” to “flip houses” and buy preconstruction condos (and are now the ones in default in the real estate mess) are the same types of people who would exploit the loopholes in 401(k) plans.

The 401(k) plan is intended to be savings for your retirement – so that we don’t wind up with a country full of poor senior citizens – but the politicians weakened the entire idea by allowing people to borrow using their 401(k) plan as collateral (originally only for an “emergency”, but that was further weakened).

First the rules:

  • You can only borrow 50% of your “vested balance”, up to a maximum of $50,000
  • You have to repay the loan in 5 years (with some exceptions)

So what some people do is deliberately withdraw their contributions right back out and spend the money – avoiding paying income taxes.  Thirty  years from now, they’ll deal with the unpaid loan balance – Live for today because we could die tomorrow.

But what happens if the “unthinkable” happens?   What if value of the investments in the 401(k) dropped by more than 50%?  Well, that could never happen of course.   The person with the 401(k) could end up owing more on their 401(k) loan than what the 401(k) is worth.    What happens then?  Forced repayment of the loan?   The 401(k) being liquidated by the trustee to pay off the loan balance?   Everyone closes their eyes and just Hopes things work out?

Well, there are 30 years left for the stock market to go back up, so why worry?  

For people trying to fend off foreclosure, borrowing against a 401(k) account is an obvious choice as there is no credit check  – the “loan” is just you borrowing you own money( right?).   You have 5 years to repay the loan back – and what’s the chance things won’t work themselves out in the next 5 years?

Tick. Tick. Tick.

Stealth government takeover of business isn’t new

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Several of my “polls” highlight the fact that many of the largest companies (Wal*mart and  GE come to mind)  in the United States are already  largely owned by State Employee/Teacher Pension funds and the prepaid tuition plans where you prepay a State run fund for your children’s college tuition.

For the most part, as long as they’re making money, the state run funds have kept away from telling the companies what to do (at least publicly).  That became more visible today.

According to this Bloomberg Story, the Treasurer of the State of Connecticut (which owns 3 million shares and has lost $47 million) is publicly calling for the resignation of the CEO of Bank of America.    Is this in part a political act or just a politician trying to shift blame away from his own decisions?

From time to time, the topic of the “Social Security” Lock Box comes up, and that we should instead invest money in buying stocks in American companies. 

The Republican proposals generally are along the line of the 401(k) plans,where you could take a portion of the social security taxes and invest them in mutual funds.  

The Democrats usually think in terms of having the Social Security administration invest a portion of the income stream in stocks, the same way the State Employee/Teacher pension funds do – which is defacto nationalization of U.S. business. 

It’s going to become really important to understand the difference.