Archive for June 3rd, 2009

The Showdown

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

A Federal Appeals court has put the sale of Chrysler to Fiat on hold for 10 days.   A group led by a pension fund in Indiana has filed suit that the Federal Government is breaking their own laws by putting an entity preferred by the government (the UAW health care fund) in front of the secured creditors, in violation of the way the bankruptcy law and decades of law say that bankruptcy law works.

The “Showdown” is whether the United States is going to continue to be a nation of laws, where everyone can make rational decisions based on knowing what the rules are and the government enforcing the rules.  The alternative is government by decree and personality cult, justified by government designated “emergencies”.  

The courts are supposed to be the checks and balances against a runaway President. The future of the country is at stake.  If the Court of Appeals caves on this issue, then we have become Venezuela.  Let’s hope the concepts put in place 225 years ago are stronger than the power of MSNBC.

A different theory about Air France crash

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

The current generation of large commercial jetliners barely need a pilot, other than to reassure the passengers.  The savings in fuel costs of the latest generation of planes are because most of the decision making is taken out of the hands of the pilot.  the plane decides based on the route, amount of fuel on board, weight of the passengers and cargo, and the wind conditions, etc… how fast to climb, how much throttle to apply, etc… so the plane arrives at the destination right on time and with the minimum amount of fuel consumed. 

The Airbus is a “fly by wire” aircraft – the controls in the cabin are nothing more than what a joystick and mouse do on your computer.   They are just control inputs into the computers – they aren’t actually connected to anything.  (your car probably has at least several controls that are also like that – your car doesn’t have a rod from the gas pedal to a carburetor – your “gas pedal” is just an input to the computer that controls the engine and the transmission.

So here is my crazy theory – the pilots were asleep – and the plane flew itself right into the thunderstorm.  By the time the pilots realized they had a problem, it was too late to solve.  The plane was 4 hours into its flight, cruising at 35,000 feet – it was beyond the range where ground radios would be pestering the pilots, and it was the middle of the night.   The plane flies itself, and will even prevent pilots from taking actions that the computer decides are unsafe.  Large thunderstorms in the middle of the night are a bit unusual.  The stories of pilots falling asleep are more common over the Pacific Ocean where the flights are even longer and more boring.

If you have cruise control on your car, you’ve had a small dose of this.  With a car with cruise control, you can become very inattentive to the journey…  you snap out of it and think…. wow, I just drove for 2 hours, and I don’t remember a single thing that happened.    Probably if some danger was apparent, you would have become more alert and reacted, but maybe not.

The unintended consequence of too much technology is you expect it to always work, and lose the ability to cope when the technology fails.

*** Update ***

My theory is looking really good at this point.  This report mentions that Air France does have the final 4 minutes of flight data from the satellite link.   The pilots took autopilot off the same minute that the plane started to break up.   They let the plane fly itself right into a fatal thunderstorm without taking corrective action until the plane was already doomed.

Banking, Chicago style

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Having taken US Treasury TARP funds from Tim Geithner, and being subjected to his “Stress test”, several TARP recipients have surprised the U.S. Treasury by easily selling new stock and raised money in the past few weeks with the goal of paying back the TARP money, paying off their loan shark, and no longer being subject to the whims of President Obama and a Democratic Congress.  How naive.

Bloomberg reports that the [US Treasury has moved the finish line], saying that what they said just a week ago for the firm’s  capital requirements no longer applies, and the U.S. Treasury won’t allow the TARP money to be paid back.

Do banks have kneecaps?

Does anayone else hear the distance sound of the drums of war?

Repeating the same mistake

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

A number of sources are reporting that GM and Chrysler’s new car sales are “better than analyst projections” – in the case of GM – only down 30% from last year, instead of the expected 39%.  (See any “spin” there?)

So assuming that’s actually true, why the counterintuitive result of people returning to the showrooms of companies about to go into bankruptcy?  

Here is my guess:   One of the early companies that got the Tim Geithner “bailout treatment” was GMAC.   GMAC makes car loans (mostly for GM cars).   They borrow money using bonds and then use that money to fund car loans.   GMAC got clobbered by the Federal Reserve forcing down interest rates – they had borrowed a -lot- of money for terms of up to 10 years and more (longer than a car load lasts). 

When the Federal Reserve pushed down interest rates, GMAC ended up having to make loans for less than what they were having to pay for the money.   The value of GMAC’s bonds began to drop, and as people started to worry that GMAC would never recover, the credit rating and price of the GMAC bonds became close to worthless, which then seriously hampered GM’s’ ability to sell new cars, to the point that GM was referring potential buyers to banks and other lenders instead of GMAC.

So one of the first things Paulson and Geithner did was to flood GMAC with cheap money, and combine the activities of GMAC with Chrysler’s financing company.   In December 2008, The US Treasury injected $6 billion, and converted GMAC into a “bank” (GMAC having never paid into FDIC and not having any “deposits”).  GMAC acquired a small bank to make that magic happen – it was named GMAC Bank, and now Ally Bank.

Remember the woman before the election who announced when Obama was elected that she would not have to pay her mortgage and would get a free car?  People scoffed at how naive she must have been.  The joke’s on us.  Remember Oprah’s Free Chicken Dinner giveaway and how word spread  so quickly within the community that there wasn’t enough free chicken to hand out?

Given Obama and Geithner’s obvious desire to manage failure, it seems very probable to me that they sent the word to GMAC to “just forget the credit scores” – we’ve got your backs – the same way the government “backstopped” Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae for home mortgages.  So GM and Chrysler may be selling cars to people who can’t possibly qualify for the car loan in normal times, or at interest rates that don’t reflect the risk of repossession down the road. 

Toyota’s sales were down 47% – they don’t have the luxury of ignoring credit risk.   The more the government gets involved, the more they change the competitive environment.   While they may not take over Ford, the competitive advantage that being financed by the government may ultimately drive you out of business – until a few years from now when GMAC is holding a worthless portfolio of uncollectible loans, and then we have a hole another trillion deeper.

Just like a woman can’t be half-pregnant, you can’t half-nationalize an industry.