When she said, “We got him!” it left me wondering if she was just posing as a reporter and it was all part of an elaborate scheme by the military to weed-out the weak soldiers who did not have the stomach to launch Hellfire missiles at certain targets.
At the start of the Vietnam war, there are not many Viet Cong. The US killed many times that number and a decade ended up outnumbered and forced to retreat. Where could all the new ones have come from?
Where did the Viet Cong come from? JFK bailed out the French Foreign Legion and got the US involved, big mistake. JFK was killed. Walter Cronkite and the rest of the Establishment Media reported the Gulf of Tokin incident made it expedient for the US to go to war against North Vietnam. President Lyndon Johnson charged full speed ahead, although it has been shown to be a false flag event.
Welcome to the country led by those whose religion is based partly on Perpetual War.
At some point I was going to warn to be on the lookout for a Gulf of Tonkin incident in Syria.
Rush the other day was talking in general terms about Benghazi (at least I think it was Rush)… I really get the impression that the CIA and affiliated agencies really are working from their own agenda more than ever – Since Obama isn’t providing leadership and oversight, they just do what they want to do following their own agenda until something blows up in their face then it’s like the president is blindsided. It’s pretty clear Obama wants nothing to do with Syria, while the State Department and certain legislators are just looking for the slightest opening as an excuse to bomb / invade yet another country
One of the long standing Alex Jones theories is much of the purpose of Iraq and Afghanistan was to develop the techniques and tools necessary to use military force to pacify a civilian population, namely the United States at some point in the future – not necessarily the US Military, but a military under some multilateral mandate – aka NATO, the UN, some Global Banking Cabal, none of which will be constrained by silly pieces of 200 year old paper, US Courts, or laws passed by some quaint “State” government
Right, but these state laws will slow down the implementation of the process. All of what Alex is reporting may, should, will (who really knows) come to pass. But, it is their Plan, and it will be done in phases. That is why I have been posting the future Tetrads that will occur in this century, because it appears to be some sort of Timeline. A careful examination of future astronomical events could reveal, or expose their Plan because it could be events that must be adhered to, for whatever reason.
History will eventually show this president did a great deal to weaken this country in every conceivable way while strengthening the bureaucracy and empowering those who would do us harm. Executive orders, Egypt, Libya, Obamacare, drones, legal precedent, DHS (yes, continuing from W)…what am I missing?
This is what happens when a New World Order POTUS gets the reins. But enough about the 90s. As the lone superpower, the overlords had to hobble us somehow. Mission accomplished.
According to the wording of Senate bill SB1057, “the use of unmanned aircraft systems by private individuals to conduct surveillance of other private persons” means private individuals could conduct surveillance of the government? Is that not what we are supposed to do, keep a vigilant eye on those who are in government?
Dangit, now the webcrawlers will discover this neat loophole and they’ll plug that hole. Kiss your freedoms goodbye folks.
“Heather Linebaugh, a former imagery analyst in the US Air Force’s drone program, writes a searing account about the uncertainty of piloting a drone.
What the public needs to understand is that the video provided by a drone is not usually clear enough to detect someone carrying a weapon, even on a crystal-clear day with limited cloud and perfect light. This makes it incredibly difficult for the best analysts to identify if someone has weapons for sure. One example comes to mind: “The feed is so pixelated, what if it’s a shovel, and not a weapon?” I felt this confusion constantly, as did my fellow UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] analysts. We always wonder if we killed the right people, if we endangered the wrong people, if we destroyed an innocent civilian’s life all because of a bad image or angle.” http://gizmodo.com/uh-oh-drone-operators-cant-tell-a-weapon-from-a-shove-1491560353
I was wondering there at the end who the woman was working for – the good guys or the bad guys?
Her business card said InfoWars.com
I recognize that diesn’t really answer your question
When she said, “We got him!” it left me wondering if she was just posing as a reporter and it was all part of an elaborate scheme by the military to weed-out the weak soldiers who did not have the stomach to launch Hellfire missiles at certain targets.
According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, POTUS has ordered the killings of about 176 children in Pakistan by the use of CIA drones. At least two of these murdered children were Americans.
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/28/killers-protecting-you-from-killers/#at_pco=cfd-1.0
At the start of the Vietnam war, there are not many Viet Cong. The US killed many times that number and a decade ended up outnumbered and forced to retreat. Where could all the new ones have come from?
Where did the Viet Cong come from? JFK bailed out the French Foreign Legion and got the US involved, big mistake. JFK was killed. Walter Cronkite and the rest of the Establishment Media reported the Gulf of Tokin incident made it expedient for the US to go to war against North Vietnam. President Lyndon Johnson charged full speed ahead, although it has been shown to be a false flag event.
Welcome to the country led by those whose religion is based partly on Perpetual War.
At some point I was going to warn to be on the lookout for a Gulf of Tonkin incident in Syria.
Rush the other day was talking in general terms about Benghazi (at least I think it was Rush)… I really get the impression that the CIA and affiliated agencies really are working from their own agenda more than ever – Since Obama isn’t providing leadership and oversight, they just do what they want to do following their own agenda until something blows up in their face then it’s like the president is blindsided. It’s pretty clear Obama wants nothing to do with Syria, while the State Department and certain legislators are just looking for the slightest opening as an excuse to bomb / invade yet another country
My caution is that we can win any battle. Kill any civilian (or in the case of Vietnam, burn down any village).
The question is – does that create more enemies than it eliminates?
“LandShark!” – Chevy Chase on recurring Saturday Night Live skit in the 1970s when the movie “Jaws” was popular.
“LandDrone!” – http://www.myfoxorlando.com/story/22403812/fbi-shooting-orlando-moments-before-fatal-shooting-of-ibragim-todashev-still-unclear
Guess he didn’t know about Fred Hampton
Amy Goodman does
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/12/4/the_assassination_of_fred_hampton_how
One of the ways to combat the future use of drones in America is that several states have either passed anti-drone legislation, or legislation is in progress of being voted on. Florida Gov. Rick Scott just signed The Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act.
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/04/26/florida-governor-signs-bill-restricting-drone-use/
One of the long standing Alex Jones theories is much of the purpose of Iraq and Afghanistan was to develop the techniques and tools necessary to use military force to pacify a civilian population, namely the United States at some point in the future – not necessarily the US Military, but a military under some multilateral mandate – aka NATO, the UN, some Global Banking Cabal, none of which will be constrained by silly pieces of 200 year old paper, US Courts, or laws passed by some quaint “State” government
Right, but these state laws will slow down the implementation of the process. All of what Alex is reporting may, should, will (who really knows) come to pass. But, it is their Plan, and it will be done in phases. That is why I have been posting the future Tetrads that will occur in this century, because it appears to be some sort of Timeline. A careful examination of future astronomical events could reveal, or expose their Plan because it could be events that must be adhered to, for whatever reason.
History will eventually show this president did a great deal to weaken this country in every conceivable way while strengthening the bureaucracy and empowering those who would do us harm. Executive orders, Egypt, Libya, Obamacare, drones, legal precedent, DHS (yes, continuing from W)…what am I missing?
This is what happens when a New World Order POTUS gets the reins. But enough about the 90s. As the lone superpower, the overlords had to hobble us somehow. Mission accomplished.
Short and to the point: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-28/government-people-do-we-say-not-we-do
If you shoot down a drone controlled by someone in “law enforcement” using a slingshot, are you guilty of murder?
(the analogy here is if you hit a police dog that has been sent to attack you, you are charged with assaulting a police officer)
What are the penalties for killing a police officer and why are they selectively enforced?
http://www.examiner.com/article/police-canine-dies-after-being-left-patrol-car-overnight
According to the wording of Senate bill SB1057, “the use of unmanned aircraft systems by private individuals to conduct surveillance of other private persons” means private individuals could conduct surveillance of the government? Is that not what we are supposed to do, keep a vigilant eye on those who are in government?
Dangit, now the webcrawlers will discover this neat loophole and they’ll plug that hole. Kiss your freedoms goodbye folks.
Here is an update:
http://gizmodo.com/giant-portrait-shows-drone-operators-that-people-arent-1559460573
“Heather Linebaugh, a former imagery analyst in the US Air Force’s drone program, writes a searing account about the uncertainty of piloting a drone.
What the public needs to understand is that the video provided by a drone is not usually clear enough to detect someone carrying a weapon, even on a crystal-clear day with limited cloud and perfect light. This makes it incredibly difficult for the best analysts to identify if someone has weapons for sure. One example comes to mind: “The feed is so pixelated, what if it’s a shovel, and not a weapon?” I felt this confusion constantly, as did my fellow UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] analysts. We always wonder if we killed the right people, if we endangered the wrong people, if we destroyed an innocent civilian’s life all because of a bad image or angle.”
http://gizmodo.com/uh-oh-drone-operators-cant-tell-a-weapon-from-a-shove-1491560353
How about if we just stop killing people in Afghanistan?
The current President was elected because President Bush had lost focus on the war in Afghanistan.
Your new icon is so “you” now
Always liked the Liberty Bell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8zuqsqdCAQ
lol
I see a teapot
Is it a cracked pot? lol