“Barack Obama is on the way to becoming a dictator”

Posted on August 2, 2013 by Fred Stiening

Who is saying that?   Some racist southern Democrat? Some gun lovin Bible clinger?

Nope.

The World Socialist Workers party

Read More

This entry was posted in American Politics, Collapse of America. Bookmark the permalink.

Warning: mysqli_query(): (HY000/29): File './wordpress/startinover_comments.MYD' not found (OS errno 13 - Permission denied) in /home/radio/startingover/wp-includes/class-wpdb.php on line 2353

14 Responses to “Barack Obama is on the way to becoming a dictator”

  1. Nidster says:
    August 2, 2013 at 3:43 pm

    Whoa! Where to start on a critique of that linked article. As always it is a heavy dose of the Hegelian Dialectic we see almost everywhere we look or read. But, these writers appear to have mastered the technique.

    OK, for those who want, or need a refresher as I do every once in a while, there is a good explanation below.

    First pay attention to the term “concealed change agents” and think Obama and the Teleprompter. Without a script, Obama could not actually say what was politically palatable to the masses because he did not believe what he was reading/saying.

    Second, the statement “Their objective is to emasculate sovereign states,” we are nearing the beginning of the middle point and it will not be much longer before the economic chaos begins anew, perhaps similar to September 2008, but perhaps it will be city by city, state by state, region by region. That would allow for the opportunity to inflict mischief and various and nefarious chaos.

    “The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian Dialectic of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

    The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic and hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

    Applying the Hegelian Dialectic, and irresistible financial influence, concealed change agents seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves — ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

    Their objective is to emasculate sovereign states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.”

  2. Nidster says:
    August 2, 2013 at 5:47 pm

    Well, if one wanted to get the Tea Party to use the dialectic the first place to start is with their hearts, euphemistically speaking of course. Get them to think dark thoughts toward mankind. Instill within their hearts a desire to control and manipulate others for a dark purpose, i.e. for one’ own enrichment, aggrandizement, and power. Next, wipe from their hearts any desire to love and help others. Wrench from their hearts any empathy or sympathy with other people.

    For the best affect start with young children because it is more difficult as people grow older. Employ that technique within a family over many generations, sorta like the royal families do. Each succession, or generation builds power and influence. Then employ others to do the nitty, gritty, dirty work so as to stay hidden in the shadows and out-of-sight, euphemistically speaking of course.

    One way to visualize the process is to imagine a free society that elects representatives to govern the people. Then one could either help get their dark compatriots elected to office, or simply corrupt the unsuspecting winners after they take office.

    It would be a long involved process, millennia even. The typical Tea Partier would not make a good candidate. It can be done with those who come from broken families, especially when the father is gone, or a surrogate, father-like figure is present. For instance, think of the circumstance of Bill Clinton or Barack Obama. In terms of it occurring within a family line think about the Bush’s.

    So, I don’t hold out any hope for good to come from an effort to employ the dialectic for the good of humanity.

    • lasong says:
      August 4, 2013 at 3:16 pm

      A perfect recent example of this is how he manufactured the false flag terror alerts as we were getting closer to learning the truth in Bengazi. Bush did the same thing when his poll numbers were down and the media was only to happy to play along. He does not care how much of our money he has to spend and is desperate from all the scandals, even though he has government officials and media lined up on his side the American people and the world won’t allow him his dictatorship.

  3. Nidster says:
    August 5, 2013 at 4:34 am

    Well said, lasong. We can hope, and especially pray that more insiders will have the courage to come forward, like those who have already done so. Perhaps a Special OPs with incontrovertible evidence, more IRS agents to speak up, perhaps some insider with good knowledge.

    Keep the hope alive that what you are advocating will come to pass. I do!

Leave a Reply