It’s hard to ask questions like this these days – but have we arrived at the point where we have given up on justice and just use bullets?
So far, the LA Times seems to be the only media source asking – did the FBI just shoot Jim DiMaggio to deliver “justice” and skip all those steps like gathering proof and having a trial?
Briefly he was the 40 year old family friend who took an unhealthy interest in their 16 year old daughter. One account mentions them going on a week long trip together without objections from the parents.
Her mom and younger brother were found dead inside Mr Dimaggio’s burning house, and he headed to Idaho with the daughter. It’s a logical inference that he killed them, but not the only plausible explanation. He was a suspect and hadn’t been charged with the crime.
When the FBI found his vehicle, they were concerned it might be booby trapped. It wasn’t.
The FBI has been very coy so far about why the hostage rescue team shot Mr DiMaggio. They have not stated that he had any weapon, that he engaged in any threatening way toward them or the girl – there isn’t even any strong evidence that the girl was there against her will. The relatives are acting pretty strangely.
Two words to ponder – Randy Weaver
Two more words: Ibragim Todashev
http://www.policymic.com/articles/43779/ibragim-todashev-how-did-the-boston-bombing-trail-lead-the-fbi-to-shoot-this-man
+110%
I thought about adding that – it set the precedent.
This was 1993, WoD fabrication… [remember the WoD is to protect ourselves from hurting ourselves] : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege
“The search warrant commanded a search “on or before February 28, 1993” in the daytime between 6:00 am and 10:00 pm. ATF made a claim that David Koresh was operating a methamphetamine lab, in order to establish a drug nexus and obtain military assets under the War on Drugs. However, the evidence was stale, partly based on an unreliable “hot spot” detected by infrared surveillance, partly based on disgruntled ex-members who had left six years earlier, and it ignored all the evidence that the lab had been dismantled by Koresh when he took charge and had been given to the Sheriff for destruction.[33][34]”
and
“Eventually, the FBI launched an assault and initiated a tear gas attack in an attempt to force the Branch Davidians out. During the attack, a fire engulfed Mount Carmel Center and 76 men, women, and children,[8][9] including David Koresh, died.”
We had to kill the children to save the children
It inspired the Federal Building bombing in Oklahoma City that occurred on its anniversary.
Where is Chuck Harder today?
http://www.wnd.com/2010/10/214357/ What’s up with Chuck.
That was a troll to see if I could draw out the Chuck Harder stalker who writes me every few months telling me how the campaign to destroy him is going. What the WND story doesn’t clarify is Harder hated both the Bushes and the Clintons – he backed H Ross Perot. If he was running as a 501 (c) (3), he definitely was in trouble – his radio program was heavily political and trying to influence elections. He also ran afoul of people locally – he owned a hotel on the Suwannee river in Florida and opened a restaurant but neglected to get permits from the health department.
Here is his hotel (closed)
http://www.telfordhotel.net/history.htm
Exactly, my first thought too!
We are just a few incidents away from them using drones on us. Like in Yemen when they use drones to kill people and say they were terrorists, who is to really to know other than what the gov’t media say’s, there was no trial they could have been campers or people driving around for all we know.
yeah, hell they will crash through your door at night in your house, from a tip from some informant or some inuendo.
They will shoot your dog (who is barking a warning) and terrorize your children and and yell & curse at you and your wife pinned on the floor, if you are not shot in the initial breaking down of your front door.
Don’t need no stinking warrent.
They will tear your home apart, ruin your life. Its a sad state we are in. They know who is the gangs, and drug dealers. But they know those guys shoot back.
Drones will hit your house next, to trial needed. I know sometimes its just motions they go through for trials, cause you don”t have the money or resources like the gov’t .
Best you can do is stay under the radar and pray this never happens you
parrott
There are stories where the police enter a fence with a dog, leave the gate open, then shoot the dog because it wasn’t kept inside a fence
Shoot the dog first, women are next, just like in the Ruby Ridge siege.
If anyone is noticing, the BlameStream Media’s reactions to these stories are 180 degrees out-of-phase. That should tell us all we really need to know. Get ready, or get out!
Opps, we forgot this one…. here is an update:
http://www.sandiego6.com/story/cia-director-brennan-confirmed-as-reporter-michael-hastings-next-target-20130812
Stratfor is a CIA Contractor? I”m shocked, I tell you.
Someone should really pass that on to John Batchelor. Next thing someone will suggest that Batchelor might be a CIA asset spreading psyops disinformation to the public. What is this world coming to?
Has anyone heard from Paul Alexander?
Was Paul the gay one?
Paul was a fellow at the Hoover Institution – I’m shocked!
I don’t know. But he was the Democrat side of Batchelor and Alexander about 10 years ago.
From Wikipedia, he’s apparently been doing work in broadway and stuff. One of his projects was a Dracula thing – I bet you anything he knows Joey Reynolds, who can’t get enough Broadway vampires
It is a good show now, but I think it was a better show then because they were good friends and generally took opposite sides of issues. I believe they met because they live in the same building.
They remind me a bit of Mary Matalin and James Carville – they enjoy the process of manipulating public opinion, but at the end of the day it’s all just a game and not much more.
Bachelor’s show was good when I used the podcast, and listen to the 15 minutes out of the 4 hours that was interesting. He developed a cadre of regular guests, many of whom I had no interest in. One of the more interesting is Gordon Chang of the WSJ – but after 10 years of “the Chinese economy is going to collapse any second now”, he reminds me more of Joe Granville.
Batchelor does have regular guests and while they are good, we learn less and less new stuff from them each time they appear.
One of his guests is Larry Kudlow of CNBC and Cumulus fame.
Larry’s weekend radio show is a lot more interesting than his CNBC show and worth a listen. It is one of the few financial shows other than Bob Brinker’s Moneytalk that is on this site.
BTW – I do recommend listing the Bloomberg radio shows that appear on many radio stations – they are not selling penny stocks like some of the other financial shows. 😉
For the most part Bloomberg’s shows are listed, but there is little audience for them. To make them show up, you have to make sure the station type is all rather than news/talk, since WBBR and the stations that carry Bloomberg are “biz talk”. I suppose if I was clever, I could enable some kind of multi select on station type, but I don’t sense it would be useful
My general rule of thumb is I spend effort on what people listen to, not what I want them to listen to – hence my giving up on listing Canadian stations.
Most people who are seriously into the financial markets have their eyes glued to a TV. Bloomberg radio is the TV without the picture, which just doesn’t work… “looking at this chart of the interest rate curve….” – sorry, I can’t see it on my radio
Bloomberg WBBR does simulcast some TV content, but only a few hours per day- during market hours, it is different programming. In general, the radio repeats the market levels very frequently and the TV does not since there are real time tickers across the screen.
I fouund that several of the Bloomberg programs are syndicated and appear on many stations that do not have Bloomberg radio all day.
I believe there is a station in Plattsburgh and now one in Boston that simulcast WBBR. I also believe there had been but is no longer one on Long Island that did the same.
Everything is fine the way it is – I sometimes forget to go to other pages on the site. lol
More details trickle in
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-dimaggio-hannah-anderson-20130815,0,2438724.story
He was shot at least 5 times
Basic facts I want to know:
Are Hannah’s parents divorced? Who has custody?
How did Mom and little brother wind up at DiMaggio’s house? Were they killed elsewhere and brought there? Was Mom romantically involved with Jim DiMaggio? Where was Dad that day?
Amazing how often the truth is never allowed to get in the way of the “story” as framed by the MSM.
The Matthew Shepard cause celebré “story is a classic example:
http://www.aim.org/media-monitor/exploiting-matthew-shepard/
Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes truth.