Paula Deen: Not Guilty

How does she get her reputation back?

Bet that wasn’t in the news…

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Paula Deen: Not Guilty

  1. Nidster says:

    Politics of Destruction, aka Bill ‘da Sexual Predator’ Clinton’s term. Then da ObamaNation. Looking’ forward to da Hillary ‘We came, We saw, He died’ Clinton is up next!!!!

  2. briand75 says:

    She doesn’t get her reputation back. She is toast forever more. Thank you PC police.

    Hillary will be another step above current levels of personal destruction.

  3. Parrott says:

    I am going out and buying a Paula Dean skillet.
    Well, we can all hope some of the skirts ‘interns’ that Hilliary chased at the state department come forward and we have some ‘bimbo eruptions’ when she runs. LOL

    CBS sunday morning has some loony suggest that Hilliary be put on our money, Like QE is on Canadian money. or may Maya Angelou.
    I thought, are you kiddin me ? I sure hope not.
    parrott

    • lasong says:

      At least Dean did not allow people to be killed, that most she is guilty for is making tasty food easy to prepare and getting her audience a little overweight by thier own hand. Who has not used a slur in 30 years.

  4. Art Stone says:

    Actually, I somewhat deliberately misrepresented this story. She wasn’t found “not guilty” – the judge found that woman had no standing to sue for race discrimination because she isn’t black – she had just added on the racism charge cause she felt badly for black people. Her main target for grabbing money is Uncle Bubba, the co-owner of the restaurant – for creating a hostile work environment..

  5. Nidster says:

    da N-Word is spoken at the least 1 million time every day in America.

    So, if Paula spoke it just once, 30 years ago, it means she uttered a word that has been spoken: 1 million X 365.25 days X 30 years = 10,957.5 trillion times since she spoke it, once.

    We are inside the power of da Dialectic!

    Other Dialectic words are: terrorist, muslim, Coptic Christian, Liberal, Rush Limbaugh, Republican, Conservative……get used to it folks. Anyone willing to add to this post before it is deleted?

    • Art Stone says:

      One of the more influential people of the dialectic is Noam Chomsky – he made it his life’s work to prove that words have no actual meaning and can be bent to mean whatever you want them to be.

      He is also the guy who came up with the PERL scripting language – it’s a brilliant piece of work, but I’ve been unable to learn it as his book gets political every few sentences.

      • CC1s121LrBGT says:

        Chomsky is a bit too leftist for me, but the way he dissects political language is absolutely brilliant.

      • CC1s121LrBGT says:

        While I don’t agree with a lot of what changes Mr. Chomsky believes would make the world a better place, I do believe Mr. Chomsky has an clear understanding on how the world works – he is able to see through the smoke and haze created by politicians and corporate public relations firms to see things as they are. As such, he needed to be watched and was watched by sneaky dishonest liars:

        http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/cia-spied-noam-chomsky

      • CC1s121LrBGT says:

        “Chomsky: The U.S. behaves nothing like a democracy
        The MIT professor lays out how the majority of U.S. policies are opposed to what wide swaths of the public want
        By Noam Chomsky

        Saturday, Aug 17, 2013 08:30 AM EST”

        from http://www.salon.com/2013/08/17/chomsky_the_u_s_behaves_nothing_like_a_democracy/

        • Art Stone says:

          “According to received doctrine, we live in capitalist democracies”

          WTF? What the hell is “received doctrine”?

          So we’re left with two options – either Chomsky is not familiar with the intent of the founding fathers that they fiercly fought anyone who wanted to create the United States as a Democracy, knowing that would doom it to destruction in a few years – or he is deliberately lying about history or pretening he can rewrite it and nobody that reads Salon is bright enough to notice..

          If we were in a democracy, and we held a vote tomorrow “Do you want to end the Federal Income Tax”, is there any doubt it would pass (about 53 to 47%). Then what? There goes the lynch pin of the entire progressive movement.

          It does sound like he is on the warpath against Obama, however – so this isn’t all bad.

          “Obama’s now conducting the world’s greatest international terrorist campaign”

    • Art Stone says:

      One of my more interesting moments back in my AOL days was a conversation where I asserted that the term Progressive is just as meaningless as “moral majority”. To say you believe in Progress begs the question – “what is progress?”.

      If I think lowering the rate of children born to unwed mothers would be progress, then encouraging marriage is a Progressive idea. Conservatives need to start deconstructing the deconstructors and turn their own weapons on the enemy.

  6. Parrott says:

    Awesome skillet !
    parrott

    • CC1s121LrBGT says:

      “When she told me the dates, I was like, ‘Oh my God,’” said Spanswick, who was authorized to speak on behalf of the family. – from http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-dimaggio-hannah-anderson-20130815,0,2438724.story

      • Art Stone says:

        Hannah said during her ill advised online chat that Jim used a timing device to delay the start of the fire at the house, but she also claims she didn’t know her mother and brother were dead. She’s no innocent and up to her eyeballs in this. Why did they have 13 phone conversations the day of the murders?

        I’m not the only one who senses there is a lot more to this. Jim DiMaggio was 40 and owned a house? What was his source of income? His father (if that story is right) was a meth user. Why did the relatives clean out Mom’s apartment if that isn’t where the murder was? Why did the relatives say Hannah would be hospitalized if she was unhurt?

Leave a Reply