http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/02/27/british-spies-confronted-by-surprising-amount-of-porn-as-they-secretly-monitored-webchats/
So how long before it becomes government doctrine that there is no expectation of privacy when two people get naked over an internet connection? The fact that the agency calls webcam images “porn” suggests they don’t understand the concept of privacy at all.
Glass making it even easier
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/21/how-to-make-sex-more-awesome-using-google-glass
One definition of pornography includes nudity… I don’t understand that definition. To me, there needs to be some activity rather than just a picture of someone taking a shower of getting dressed/undressed… but that is only me.
A source of some amusement to me back in my AOL chat days was the “volunteer hall monitors” having the mentality of the George Carlin banned word list. Ideas are much more powerful than words. Banning profanity is there to protect the adults from the children.
Wasn’t this a similar idea used in the movie Brainstorm. Where the one fellow was recording his “encounter” with a lady and he/they didn’t erase it and the engineer found the tape of their activity and the found the guy in his house having orgasm after orgasm and then a heart attack? The only difference seems that the recording program recorded everything the guy was experiencing along with what he was seeing. Great concept for the person that is “encounter” deprived. Just a thought.
Brainstorm? That sounds like a pole or vortex. 😉
Very good description but I am old so it took me a minute. LOL
I wonder if they know about Chat Roulette
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InYvRyX2Fu4