Since the US House seems to have no problem with NSA building a database of every call detail made, it probably won’t be bothered by this either:
Search
Previous Blogs
-
Recent Posts
Recent comments
- RebelSansClue said Ugh. It’s all true, but dismal. I liked listening to Rush on AM radio. I was born way too late. I just wasn’...
- Fred Stiening said The outage for the past couple days was partly related to this issue, but not completely The blog is back restored as it...
- Fred Stiening said I was notified this morning that they resolved the problem and the current extract appears to be correct. It will proba...
- Fred Stiening said I surrender. I looked through all the reasonable ways to connect radio stations with their licensee. I have now change...
- Fred Stiening said No response. No Surprise.
- RebelSansClue said I hope to God that it’s the staff of the prison doing the listening. Didn’t think prisoners had access to i...
Popular Posts
The 15 most visited posts in last 60 days:- Audacy files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
- Garbage In, Garbage Out
- The End Game for AM radio
- Who streams from here?
- GDPR Notice
- The future of Salem media
- Where are they now?
- Alex Jones is baaaack!
- The Decline of the Dickey Empire
- What is the SIPC?
- John Boehner on SOPA
- 16 tons of student debt
- Silent Station List
- IMG_0954
- Meet Cathy Hughes
Archives
Login
You MUST remember this when you are on a jury and make sure other jurers are fully aware:
“If the government is able to determine a person’s password, which is typically stored in encrypted form, the credential could be used to log in to an account to peruse confidential correspondence or even impersonate the user. Obtaining it also would aid in deciphering encrypted devices in situations where passwords are reused. “
So if I say “it wasn’t me – the government gets passwords to login to people’s accounts and incriminate people”, how does the government prove they didn’t?
Worth keeping in mind when a friend IMs you. It used to drive me nuts how moms would let their young children be logged on as mom, not recognizing the danger they are creating for men. Fortunately, I don’t do inappropriate things, but I have to think a few mn have had Weiner moments.
In honor of Mr Snowden, the skip directly to 2:30 – the password is “escape” lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O53InrcX9C4&list=PL3B8985E18E34F9B1
the Police State, aka da Beast, is tightening its grip on the good citizens of America. ObamaCare allows it to have unconstitutional access to our bank accounts, and da Beast openly admits to (unconstitutionally) scarfing up all communications to be stored in a database for later use against us, so why would it stop with the next step in demanding our passwords?
The question to be asked is, “What unalienable rights of the citizens will da Beast respect?”
Here are a couple interesting paragraphs from: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/chris-christie-rand-paul-2016-election-94789.html
“In the words of the governor’s favorite lyricist, ‘You know that flag flying over the courthouse, Means certain things are set in stone. Who we are, what we’ll do and what we won’t,’” Stafford added, citing Bruce Springsteen lyrics.
Paul continued the attacks on Twitter, tweeting from his official Senate account on Friday “Christie worries about the dangers of freedom. I worry about the danger of losing that freedom. Spying without warrants is unconstitutional.”
Paul’s campaign account took the jabs a step further on Friday, writing Christie’s last name as (Crist)ie, perhaps as a suggestion that the New Jersey governor is a party switcher, like former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist who switched from the Republican to Democratic party in 2012.
“Chris (Crist)ie thinks freedom is dangerous. Dangerous is borrowing money from China to send to people who burn our flag,” one tweet read.
“Chris (Crist)ie should hear from more Americans who value both security and privacy,” said another.