Glenn Beck: Talk Radio will be over in 5 years

Pretty bold prediction

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/04/glenn-becks-bold-speech-to-a-room-full-of-journalists-your-old-media-models-are-dying/

I think 2 years is closer. In 2012, very little political advertising went to radio. National ads are dead due to boycotts. Cumulus and Clear Channel are very vulnerable to changes in interest rates. Rush is not a spring chicken.

This entry was posted in Glenn Beck, Radio Biz, Talk Radio. Bookmark the permalink.

34 Responses to Glenn Beck: Talk Radio will be over in 5 years

  1. Probably by 2016, anyway. The Fairness Doctrine will return to radio, I’m certain of that. God forbid there be one form of mass media that is not dominated by liberals who don’t allow an opposing viewpoint.

    Remember Air America? Great, wasn’t it. It was like MSNBC without the objectivity.

  2. Parrott says:

    that’s bad news. Unless you buy your own station and run it yourself. I think that’s why there are a bunch of guys just airing over the internet.
    Alex is sort of a hybrid,

    We love sports ?
    parrott

  3. Nidster says:

    Liberals are lousy at talk radio, no support from the masses. So they might think they will have everything under their control if talk radio dies out.

    • They’ll have to shut down podcasts then. No one is really watching TV anymore, or it’s seriously splintered. Tight control of the internet will have to be next.

      • Art Stone says:

        As proof of that, Arsenio Hall’s return to late night TV zoomed into first place the first week – in adults 18-49 with a 0.7 rating, 3% share.

        The show has already dumped its executive producer.

        • Nidster says:

          Strange as it might seem, I like tuning into All Things Considered between 4-6 when in tooling around the backcountry. Sure, it’s supposed to be liberal but they cover a wide range of topics in more depth than almost any news source I can think of offhand. They also cover both sides of the political story (albeit from an Establishment slant).

          • Art Stone says:

            You are not alone.

            While I generally like Rush, the thing I don’t like is he has the strategy (he has said so directly) that he uses repetition to hammer his points home. He takes 5 minutes of material and stretches it to take up three hours. That results in a low amount of information. It’s a very ineffective use of my time.

            For a while, I was using recording software that allowed recording the show and playing the audio back at 2x normal speed. Strip out the news, ads, and repetitive content and it took maybe 20 minutes to listen to the three hours. On John Batchelor, I often skipped entire hours (“Tonight I’m speaking with the author of a book about the use of fishing boats during the Crimean war to spy on China”)

          • CC1s121LrBGT says:

            If you like “All Things Considered”, then you should consider “As It Happens” on the Canadian equivalent – it is quite good and similar – here is a description

            http://www.cbc.ca/programguide/program/as_it_happens

          • Nidster says:

            Hey, CC. I like the premise of “As It Happens” to shun “pack journalism”. I will give a listen. Thanks!

            Art, you nailed Rush pretty good in your post, although I would go a little farther down the road by saying Rush juggles several ‘stories’ on a rotating basis. Rush deals with the topic of the day and keeps a rolling commentary going on diverse issues such as those pertaining to pro football. For instance PC opposition to Washington’s team name, the Redskins is a sub-topic, and so on and so forth.

            As a frequent listener, while I work, these topics and subtopics are intertwined in his show. He frequently bounces from one to another. Then every once in a while he’ll say, “Look at me. This is important.”

            As an aside, Geraldo interviewed a sports writer today who claimed to be gay. The guy was saying that he preferred people who feigned some sort of offense regarding the Redskins name would just get a little thicker skin. He thinks some gays also need thicker skins and should stop complaining about their ‘perceived’ biases against gays.

            Pitting one group against another is a top priority of the Dialectic, which is designed to keep people quarreling amongst themselves so as to keep the real evil hidden. just sayin’

          • Art Stone says:

            Phil Hendrie is out of the closet. He is now back to being a California liberal. As I wrote about previously, his being a Conservative was an act, probably forced on him by Roy Masters. At the same time he was playing Conservative to his national audience, he was doing a local show on a progressive talk station. When you go down his list of Pre-TRN characters, most of thm portray Conservtives and/or Republicans as very awful people.

            The other night, he did a big long bit about a Conservative host who has been doing talk radio longer than Rush Limbaugh and the concept was to disclose that the Conservative talk show host is gay. It was a pretty vile piece of work and not at all clever or funny.

    • lasong says:

      What’s Beck trying to sell? maybe a subscription to his show, still don’t know what to do with all the store-able food, seeds and gold he sold me along with a few bad books.

  4. CC1s121LrBGT says:

    Tantaros – It will all be up to you and Monica Crowley. 😉

  5. Parrott says:

    And that hottie, Jedediah Bila.
    smokin !
    Parrott

  6. briand75 says:

    I am going to start a travel company. Trips will be to places where insanity isn’t the rule of life. Talk radio, TV, Netflix, Hulu – all technology geared to turn a brain into jello. It’s time to travel and clear the mind. I will accept suggestions on destinations.

  7. Nidster says:

    Coober Pedy, Australia. The opal capital of the world is a dandy place to strike it rich while building your house.

Leave a Reply