State Department ruler John F’ing Kerry’s rhetoric grows more and more bizarre
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24004836
“We in the United States know, and our French partners know, that this is not the time to be silent spectators to slaughter,” he said.
Yes, the time for the US to stand silently by was in 1975 as South Vietnam fell and the slaughter of 7.5 million civilians in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam began – in no small part due to your false testimony to Congress and Walter Cronkite’s feigned shock at the situation in Vietnam.
As another point of historical irony, Vietnam had been known earlier as French Indochina – a French run colony. Some guy named Ho Chi Minh fought the French and defeated them in 1954, laying the foundation for US intervention to protect the former French colony. A picture of Mr Kerry’s 1993 visit to Vietnam now is proudly displayed on the walls of the Ho Chi Minh museum in Hanoi.
Let’s see if I can help clarify the full and complete meaning Sec. Kerry was trying to express, “We in the United States know, and our French partners know, that this is not the time to be silent spectators to slaughter, we need to be active participants and al-Obama want to do some of the slaughtering too.”
Got some new French rifles for sale! Never been fired only dropped once !
LOL
parrott
Looks like Kerry is now in the lurch: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/09/09/Putin-takes-advantage-of-kerry-blunder
News photo: http://www.fototime.com/32C7D88836D1A22/orig.jpg 😉
This bit about turning over control of the weapons to international supervision is brilliant. The Russians love chess. Queen to Rook 8.
Sarin gas is typically stored as a binary agent – two inert components that are inert by themselves – once mixed, they have a short shelf life and you risk killing yourself, so munitions typically mix the gas on launch.
It’s not like atomic weapons where the IAEA already knows how much you have and where it is. There is no way to prove that all the stockpiles have been disclosed. Once the international group “controls” the weapons, that shifts the presumption of any future attack to the rebels. It also puts the responsibility for securing the weapons from rebel control on whoever this international group is. Assad can say “some weapons are over there, but my troops can’t get there” and force the UN (?) troops to suppress the rebels.
A caller to a show asked a profound question earlier – what if it is proven that the rebels did the attack? Since Obama has made the chemical weapons the focus, would that force Obama to join with Assad to fight the rebels? If it doesn’t it lays naked the truth that it’s about naked US military aggression, not that we’re doing it to protect the children.
Also, how do you bomb a storage site for chemical weapons without creating massive civilian deaths nearby?
Yeah, some valid observations. al-Assad could also announce he is inviting Putin into the country to help with disposal of the chem-weapons. The scope of the job might take a few years. It would require a huge contingent of Ruskie scientist/workers, who would need protection. Hence move in a couple of divisions of Ruskie boots on the ground, 2 or 3 airbases, expanded Mediterranean port facilities and so on and so forth. I’m fairly certain Putin dislikes al-Queda rabble as much as he dislikes Chechnian rabble so he might just relish running joint operations in order to relieve al-Queda of their chem-gas stockpiles.
The odds are probably close to zero the above would happen, but there is absolutely no other good alternative to the Ruskie’s current Mediterranean naval port in Syria, and Cyprus would serve as a base of operations for production of its natural gas fields.
Hells Bells, Putin could achieve near-godlike status in the ME by defying the Evil Empire. Plus Russia would have Turkey encircled on the north, west and south. Wonder if that would set Reagan to spinning in his grave?
According to what I just heard on Savage, Obama is going to bomb no matter what.
For the first time, impeachment might become a real possibility.
If the Senate/House votes go against al-Obama and Savage is right, then the Limbaugh Theorem will be put to the test. I have to agree with Rush on any impeachment possibilities because the RINO’s would never, ever vote to impeach even if al-Obama rained sarin gas down on Syria.
Judge Napalatano on Fox News pointed out today that bombing Syria would be a war crime. There are only a few reasons Obama can legally attach a country: 1) In response for being attached, 2) In response for Syria attaching another country with which the US has a mutual defense treaty, and 3.) As a first strike to deter an imminent attack on the US.
The Judge (formerly a NJ Supreme Court Judge) pointed out that by his own admission, Obama is claiming a reason other than one of the three legal reasons and therefore would be guilty of a war crime.
Hmmmm…..let’s see, #2: Syria attacks a country with which the US has a mutual defense treaty.
OK, what country borders Syria to the south? I smell a HUGE false flag event any day now.
According to Mike Huckabee today, in response to a caller calling him Anti-Israel for his opposition to bombing Syria, the Huckster said he knows most of the senior leaders of Israel personally and is in daily contact with them, and Israel opposes what Obama wants to do.
One of those little secrets is that Israel relies on Russia for its refined oil products since the Arab counties won’t sell to Israel. Israel and Russia are not adversaries and a large portion of the population of Israel and their descendants (50%) are Russian immigrants (Ashkenazi) who fled the Middle East after the Muslim conquest…
OK, maybe Israel opposes what Obama wants to do since they would prefer to see a stalemate of sorts in Syria and if al-Queda takes over Syria it hurts/hinders Iran?
The CFR sees a connections with the huge natural gas discoveries in the Eastern Mediterranean – the find potentially is between Israel, Cyprus, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey.
It would be a very positive development if the bright minds in the Middle East developed some innovations to speed up the use of natural gas in motor vehicles instead of fantasizing about killing each other
I had forgotten the 4th legal reason to attack a country per the Judge… it is if the UN authorizes it… and we all know that didn’t happen here, nor will China and/or Russia authorize it.
Rusty returned live at :20 in the first hour and pointed people to his Facebook page where he has plastered “CENSORED” multiple times