Ed Asner: Who gives a shit?

http://reason.com/blog/2013/09/07/has-there-been-a-rapture-of-anti-war-cel

The silence from the anti war Democrats is deafening. Cue Simon and Garfunkel and let’s listen together to the silence

This entry was posted in Collapse of America, Global Instability, War and not War, War in SW Asia / Middle East. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Ed Asner: Who gives a shit?

  1. Nidster says:

    I think the quote from Ed Asner is important, “”I voted for him, but I’m not proud. He hasn’t thrown himself on the funeral pyre. I wanted him to sacrifice himself.”

    So there you have it folks, some people wanted Barrack Hussein al-Obama, aka the One, their Messiah, to lay-down his life for them. Their faith was strengthened by al-Obama’s rhetoric, but their faith has been completely shattered by al-Obama’s actions.

    This is what happens when humans place all their faith and hope in a fraudulent person. I do not want to taunt them for their mistake because I have empathy for the people whose faith has been shattered. I also feel a bit of outrage toward them because many of those people ridicule others for their faith. I’m also outraged because those are the very people who need to be speaking out against what has been done, is being done and will be done by the fraud they helped to elect, twice!!!

    What was done to Ed Asner and the former supporters of al-Obama is to shatter their faith. Of course everyone is also a target of al-Obama’s psychological subversion of their will to fight, to speak-out about what is going on. A tactic called Zersetzung was employed by the East German Stasi police against the population. Zersetzung is designed to side-track, or “switch off” people’s will to do something or to continue any “inappropriate” activities, such as gathering together in public demonstrations.

    Tactics employed under Zersetzung could be smear campaigns, denunciations, provocations, government harassment (think IRS and so on), letting everyone know that all their communications are being listened to or read, or at least they are being saved for future use against people. Because of their subtle nature Zersetzung type tactics can be denied, which is yet another highly effective tactic to suppress a person’s will to fight, resist, speak-out and so on. Once people understand the tactics being used against them the affect of Zersetzung begins to lessen and fade away.

Leave a Reply